Both formats are massive upgrades over JPEG and PNG. WebP cuts file sizes by 25-35% vs JPEG. AVIF goes further — 50% smaller than JPEG at the same quality. But the best choice depends on your specific situation.
| Feature | WebP | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression (vs JPEG) | 25-35% smaller | 50% smaller |
| Browser support | 97% | 93% |
| Transparency | Yes | Yes |
| HDR support | No | Yes (12-bit) |
| Encode speed | Fast | Slow (5-10x slower) |
| Decode speed | Fast | Moderate |
We tested the same photo converted to both formats at visually-lossless quality:
AVIF consistently produces files 20-30% smaller than WebP at equivalent visual quality. For a website with 100 images, switching from JPEG to AVIF could save 80+ MB in total page weight.
As of June 2026, WebP works in 97% of browsers globally. AVIF is at 93%. That 4% gap represents roughly 200 million users — including some enterprise environments and older devices. For most websites, those users still need a JPEG fallback.
If you use AVIF, always provide a JPEG or WebP fallback with the <picture> element.
Need to convert your existing images? WebP2PNG lets you convert between WebP, PNG, JPG, and other formats instantly in your browser. No upload, no software install. For AVIF encoding, tools like Squoosh or ImageMagick offer command-line and GUI options.